<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The West Ham Process &#187; transfoer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://westhamprocess.FootballUNITED.com/tag/transfoer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://westhamprocess.FootballUNITED.com</link>
	<description>Musings in Claret and Blue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://golbox.com?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mido &#8211; good or bad signing? [POLL]</title>
		<link>http://westhamprocess.FootballUNITED.com/2010/02/01/mido-good-or-bad-signing-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://westhamprocess.FootballUNITED.com/2010/02/01/mido-good-or-bad-signing-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good or bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfoer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Ham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westhamprocess.com/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK  my earlier post about not being at all happy with the Mido signing  got some stick. It is clear that plenty of people feel that he&#8217;s a good acquisition to the side. I deliberately titled that post &#8216;A knee-jerk Mido reaction&#8217; because it was literally that, a knee-jerk reaction. As I mentioned in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK  my earlier post about not being at all happy with the Mido signing  got some stick. It is clear that plenty of people feel that he&#8217;s a good acquisition to the side.</p>
<p>I deliberately titled that post &#8216;A knee-jerk Mido reaction&#8217; because it was literally that, a knee-jerk reaction. As I mentioned in a comment on the same post, the outburst stemmed from the constant feeling of despondancy I&#8217;m getting from West Ham these days. How many times do we leave Upton Park feeling we should have played better, played with more passion, or got a better result? It jsut so happened that the Mido signing was the trigger or aforementioned rant&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s since become clear that he&#8217;s only on loan and only on 1k a week &#8211; so with that (and his goal scoring record on 10 in 64) in mind, &#8220;Mido, a good or bad signing&#8221;?</p>
<a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/2630811">Take Our Poll</a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westhamprocess.FootballUNITED.com/2010/02/01/mido-good-or-bad-signing-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

